|S E A R C H D V D B e a v e r|
Directed by Jerry Jameson
In August 1966, University of Texas at Austin student and ex-Marine Charles Whitman took over the top of the school's 307-foot Main Building tower and went on a shooting rampage, killing 14 people before he was fatally shot by police. Kurt Russell stars as Whitman in this chilling made-for-TV depiction of his shocking massacre; with Ned Beatty, John Forsythe, and Richard Yniguez.
Television Premiere: October 18th, 1974
DVD Review: Warner Home Video (Warner Archive Collection) - Region 0 - NTSC
|DVD Box Cover||
CLICK to order from:
Warner Home Video
Region 0 - NTSC
Average Bitrate: 5.73 mb/s
NTSC 720x480 29.97 f/s
NOTE: The Vertical axis represents the bits transferred per second. The Horizontal is the time in minutes.
|Audio||English (Dolby Digital 2.0)|
• Archive Advert (:59)
Intriguing but essentially hollow docu-drama. There's no doubt that there is a fascination with, even minor, introspection of horrific events like these. We get very little on the where's and why's of Russell's Whitman but it nonetheless keeps you curious and keen. The only hint at examination comes when an officer applauds all the locals aiming hunting rifles at the tower in hopes of a lucky pick-off - "I wonder what the bleeding hearts have to say about easy access to guns now". John Forsythe's character, Lieutenant Elwood Forbes, reminds him "How do you think he got all these guns in the first place?"
It's a single-layered, progressive, DVD-R that looks quite average. This was a TV movie and production value reflect the limitations in the 35mm stock used. It can get noisy and there are speckles visible but in the final estimation - it is watchable in the original 1.33 aspect ratio. Colors aren't bad considering.
As usual, no subtitles - and, unremarkable but clear 2.0 channel sound. Extras consist of the minute-long Archive advert that starts the disc presentation.
I bought this as I was interested to see the film and Russell's performance. The Deadly Tower seems to avoid the type of depth that the event demands. It could have been a 3-4 hour film if details were examined to the extent they deserved. I'd have to say 'pass' on this one. It offered no answers or... relevant discussion questions. It does far less than you could determine from reading this article and the price is exorbitant for what is offered.