Criterion - Spine # 227

Region 0 - NTSC

1.33:1 Original Aspect Ratio
Average Bitrate: 6.97 mb/s
NTSC 720x480 29.97 f/s

1.33:1 Original Aspect Ratio
Average Bitrate: 7.59 mb/s
PAL 720x576 25.00 f/s

NOTE: The Vertical axis represents the bits transferred per second. The Horizontal is the time in minutes.

Criterion

Optimum

2.0 Dolby Digital Mono French

Aspect Ratio:
Fullscreen - 1.33:1

Edition Details:
• New digital transfer, with restored image and sound
• Video interview with Bertrand Tavernier, director of Coup de Torchon
• Excerpts from The Story of French Cinema by Those Who Made It: Grand Illusions 1939 – 1942, a 1975 documentary featuring Henri-Georges Clouzot
• New essay by film scholar Alan Williams, author of Republic of Images: A History of French Filmmakin
• New and improved English subtitle translation

DVD Release Date: February 17th, 2004
Keep Case

Chapters 24

Aspect Ratio:
Fullscreen - 1.33:1

Edition Details:
• New digital remastered print
• Introduction to 'Le Corbeau' by Ginette Vincendean (24:36)
 

Chapters 12

On Criterion
This disc shows occasional damage and I suspect the print it was taken from may not have been in the best of shape. It doesn't have the, now usual, high level of Criterion sharpness and tight contrast. It is still good, mind you, just not as one might expect. I suppose that is the problem when you raise the bar so high - people expect it from you later. The image is restored, shows good balance, the subs are good, but is just a notch blow Criterion sharpness. The audio is also restored and there are excellent Extra Features.

Gary Tooze

On Optimum
The image of the Optimum DVD has considerable more picture versus the Criterion. The Criterion image lacks approx 40px left and 30px right (9.75%), and approx 55px top/bottom (10.25%). While the horizontal cropping remains fixed, the vertical moves, and as such suggests a 10% overscan. This is unacceptable and one can only wonder why Criterion has chosen to do so.

The Optimum image is very soft and "bright", versus the Criterion, which is significant darker and has more contrast. However, while Criterion at first glance looks better, there are both pros and cons. In image #2 (the graveyard), the clouds show no texture and virtually glow (due to high contrast) in the Criterion image, while the Optimum image show cloud texture and has a balanced light / contrast ration. However in image #6 (the newspaper), the text is easily readable in the Criterion image, while somewhat unclear in the Optimum image. Then again in image #4 (the street), neither the details on the door to the right, nor the details in the shadows at the back of the image, are visible, due to too the darkness and contrast on the Criterion, while clearly visible on the Optimum. And the other way around, the text on top of the store is more visible in the Criterion.

While its not really a good basis for comparison, I still checked my VHS copy from French TV and it appears to closer to the Optimum image in tone, light and contrast than to Criterion. One can thus speculate, if Criterion lowered light and boosted contrast to make it look better. Because of this and because of the serious overscan, the best picture must go to Optimum.

Henrik Sylow