![]()
![]()
![]()
(aka "Zi Hudie" )
directed by Lou Ye
China 2003
Most non-Chinese people know Zhang Ziyi
from her appearances in the martial-arts movies “Crouching
Tiger, Hidden Dragon”, “Hero”,
and “House
of Flying Daggers”. However, Zhang Ziyi is not just an action
star. In fact, she doesn’t know any martial arts; she relies on her
training as a ballet dancer in order to perform martial-arts
choreography. Zhang Ziyi has also appeared in serious dramatic pieces
such as “The
Road Home” and “Purple Butterfly”. Although she appeared
in “Rush Hour 2”, Zhang’s first lead role in an English-language
production was in “Memoirs
of a Geisha”.
Director Lou Ye received widespread praise for “Suzhou River”, so
“Purple Butterfly” was accepted as a Cannes entry. However, “Purple
Butterfly” was widely despised, so its chances of getting a decent
theatrical release in the U.S. were slim. In fact, even though I wanted
to see it, I wasn’t even aware that the DVD had been released until I
saw it on a shelf at my local Blockbuster video store. (“Purple
Butterfly” is a direct translation of the movie’s Chinese title, “Zi
Hudie”.)
Yes, I admit that I wanted to see “Purple Butterfly” because of
Zhang Ziyi and not because of the director or what I knew of the story.
However, Zhang doesn’t look like she does in her martial-arts efforts.
Since martial-arts movies are fantasies, heroines always look very
pretty, even after they’ve been in fights. In “Purple Butterfly”,
Zhang doesn’t seem to wear any make-up, and her completely de-glamorized
appearance will be a shock to viewers expecting another
camera-in-love-with-the-actress’s-face fest.
The movie begins in Manchuria during the 1920s. The Chinese Ding Hui
(Zhang Ziyi) dates the Japanese Itami (Toru Nakamura). During this
period, the Japanese occupied much of northern China. Ding Hui’s brother
doesn’t really object to her dating a Japanese man, but after a Japanese
fanatic kills her brother, Ding Hui heads to Shanghai to join an
anti-Japanese faction. The title refers to a purple butterfly pin on a
suit jacket. A lot of reviewers call Ding Hui’s anti-Japanese group as
the Purple Butterfly faction, though I don’t recall the anti-Japanese
activists referring to themselves with that term.
Ding Hui and Itami run into each other in Shanghai after he is
dispatched there as a spy. They use each other to achieve their
objectives, though Itami hopes that Ding Hui will go to Japan with him.
However, Ding Hui no longer loves Itami. The movie ends with a montage
of newsreel footage that shows what the Japanese did in Shanghai and in
Nanjing during World War II.
The script introduces secondary characters that are affected by Ding Hui
and Itami’s activities. Szeto (Liu Ye) and his girlfriend (Li Bingbing),
a telephone switchboard operator, happen to be at a train station when
anti-Japanese and Japanese operatives engage in a gunfight. Szeto’s
girlfriend is killed in the crossfire, which causes Szeto much emotional
anguish. Since the Japanese think that Szeto is an anti-Japanese
activist, he gets tortured for being in the wrong place at the wrong
time, too. The movie’s focus on Szeto and his girlfriend echoes
Krzysztof Kieslowski’s obsession with coincidence in “The Double Life of
Veronique” and the “Three Colors” trilogy. By the movie’s climax,
however, Szeto decides to take matters into his own hands rather than
letting others victimize him over and over again.
In post-production, the director crafted a movie that doubles back upon
itself a few times. However, despite the non-linearity of some
sequences, you actually know what happens to each character. What could
confuse a viewer is trying to figure out the character’s motivations. A
lot of people think that Ding Hui still loves Itami when they’re in
Shanghai. I, on the other hand, think that Ding Hui hates Itami after
her brother’s murder. In the geopolitical scheme of things, this is
really the only acceptable conclusion.
On a technical level, the movie is assembled with much care and
artistry. You’ll need to adjust to the jittery camerawork and rapid
editing, though the visual style is a big part of what makes the movie so
satisfying to watch. In fact, the cinematography is first-rate; the
image compositions and generally moody atmosphere reminded most viewers
of Wong Kar-wai. Since it’s fashionable to praise Wong Kar-wai,
comparisons between “Purple Butterfly” and “In the Mood for Love”
tend to paint Lou Ye’s movie as inferior. Really, though, “Purple
Butterfly” is as good as most of Wong’s movies.
The use of slow-motion cinematography coupled with mournful music has
become a standard fixture in contemporary Chinese-language cinema. (See
Tony Leung at the end of “Infernal Affairs”.) “Purple Butterfly”
has these moments, too. This sort of moviemaking is undeniably
affecting, but one has to wonder if directors should be encouraged in
this direction. After all, do we really want slo-mo death accompanied by
mellifluous melodies to inspire creativity?
“Purple Butterfly” is not at all the confusing mess that so many
reviewers have said it is. In fact, it has a rather simple story. That
being said, the storytelling methods are fanciful and atmospheric.
Oddly, the movie has a Romantic (as in the art movement and not love)
view of the world even though the director ultimately wants to condemn
Japan’s imperialist past. This makes the movie feel elegiac for two
reasons, one of them unnecessary. The first--the necessary--reason is
feeling sad about characters caught in the middle of others’ violence.
The second--the unnecessary--reason is feeling sad that two people can’t
love each other because they’re from opposite sides in a war. Still,
Zhang Ziyi’s character got it right when she realized that fighting the
Japanese was more important than her personal happiness.
Note: A love scene that runs about two minutes was cut from the movie
before its general release around the world. Chinese censors did not
want audiences to see a Chinese woman and a Japanese man together in an
intimate scene.
Posters
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Theatrical Release: 22 May 2003 (Cannes Film Festival)
Reviews More Reviews DVD Reviews
DVD Comparison:
Palm Pictures - Region 1 - NTSC vs. Zoke Culture - Region 0 - PAL
Big thanks to Yunda Eddie Feng for all the Screen Caps!
(Palm Pictures - Region 1 - NTSC - LEFT vs. Zoke Culture - Region 0 - PAL - RIGHT)
| DVD Box Covers |
|
|
| Distribution |
Palm Pictures Region 1 - NTSC |
Zoke Culture Region 0 - PAL |
| Runtime | 127 min | 122 min (4% PAL speedup) |
| Video |
1.85:1 Original Aspect Ratio
16X9 enhanced |
1.66:1 Aspect Ratio |
|
NOTE: The Vertical axis represents the bits transferred per second. The Horizontal is the time in minutes. |
||
|
Bitrate:
Palm Pictures
|
|
|
|
Bitrate:
Zoke Culture
|
|
|
| Audio | Dolby Digital 2.0 stereo Mandarin Chinese, Dolby Digital 5.1 Mandarin Chinese |
Dolby Digital 2.0 surround Mandarin Chinese |
| Subtitles | Optional English | Burned-in Simplified Chinese |
| Features |
Release Information: Studio: Palm Pictures Aspect Ratio:
Edition Details: Chapters 18 |
Release Information: Studio: Zoke Culture Aspect Ratio:
Edition Details:
DVD Release Date: 28 Jul 2003 Chapters 6 |
| Comments |
Video: R1 Palm The 1.85:1 anamorphic widescreen image is pretty lousy. It is mis-framed, as can be seen with captions and subtitles at the bottom of the screen being partially cut off. The contrast is all wrong, and since the print was brightened in the wrong manner, there are hardly any true blacks. Moreover, improper brightening leads to excessive grain. You can see print damage (such as vertical scratches created by cameras, film processors, and projectors). There are “cigarette burns” in the upper right-hand corner (used to indicate reel changes in theatres), which means that the print used for the DVD was a dupe of a dupe that was sent to theatres instead of a print taken directly from the master negative. Only a few clean, clear shots give you a glimpse of how this well-shot movie should look on DVD. This transfer was probably taken from an interlaced source, as evidenced by the “venetian blinds”. R0 Zoke The 1.66:1 non-anamorphic widescreen image is awful. In most places, it looks like a pirated recording made with a videocamera in a movie theatre. The picture is very dark, though fleshtones seem to be more natural than with the R1 Palm DVD. This transfer has more vertical footage than the R1 disc, though it has been cropped on the sides. It looks like the R0 PAL video was taken from a progressive source, but blocking and other video artifacts abound. Note: I’ve used the full 4x3 image of the R0 Zoke transfer to show you the weird masking that was used. The black bars are uneven lines, suggesting that “home-made” mattes were used to approximate letterboxing during shooting. Audio: R1 Palm I read other DVD reviews of “Purple Butterfly” before writing mine, and everyone praised the audio for being above-average. Those reviewers were basically lying. I watched my disc as well as three other copies of the R1 Palm DVD, and they all had the same problem. The Dolby Digital 5.1 Mandarin Chinese track is atrocious. Sometimes, the right front channel didn’t have anything, and sometimes, the left front channel didn’t have anything. The rears are weak or non-existent. Bass output is muted and inconsistent, and music reproduction is tepid. The dialogue was muffled. The 5.1 track was so aggravating that I switched to the DD 2.0 stereo Mandarin Chinese track, which was nicely-balanced, with robust bass and audible music coupled with credible rain effects (also weak in the 5.1 track) and comprehensible dialogue. Where was Quality Control??? R0 Zoke The DD 2.0 surround Mandarin Chinese track is similar to the DD 2.0 stereo track on the R1 DVD, though there is so much hiss and other ambient noises that it sounds like a recording taken inside an empty movie theatre. Extras: R1 Palm The DVD offers only a couple of previews, including one for “Purple Butterfly”, in terms of bonus features. The trailer for “Purple Butterfly” is also marred by technical problems, including a complete audio drop-out towards its end. In fact, the audio sounds wobbly for most of the trailer’s running time, leading me to believe that the trailer on the DVD was mastered from a print that made a few too many rounds in theatres before arriving in the DVD producer’s hands. There’s also a “Director’s Statement” printed on the reverse side of the keepcase cover art. R0 Zoke The DVD has about 18-minutes’ worth of trailers and promotional clips. This sampling of footage is of terrible quality, so the R0 Zoke wins this category through quantity rather than via quality. Summary: To be frank, both DVD versions of “Purple Butterfly” are terrible, but the movie is a richly rewarding experience. The R1 Palm disc is at least watchable, though be sure to pick the DD 2.0 stereo track instead of the badly-authored DD 5.1 track. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Screen Captures
(Palm Pictures - Region 1 - NTSC - TOP vs. Zoke Culture - Region 0 - PAL - BOTTOM)
|
|
|
|
(Palm Pictures - Region 1 - NTSC - TOP vs. Zoke Culture - Region 0 - PAL - BOTTOM)
|
|
|
|
(Palm Pictures - Region 1 - NTSC - TOP vs. Zoke Culture - Region 0 - PAL - BOTTOM)
|
|
|
|
(Palm Pictures - Region 1 - NTSC - TOP vs. Zoke Culture - Region 0 - PAL - BOTTOM)
|
|
|
|
(Palm Pictures - Region 1 - NTSC - TOP vs. Zoke Culture - Region 0 - PAL - BOTTOM)
|
|
|
|
Report Card:
|
Image: |
R1 Palm |
|
Sound: |
R1 Palm |
| Extras: | R0 Zoke |
| Menu: | R1 Palm |
![]()
![]()
![]()
DONATIONS Keep DVDBeaver alive and advertisement free:
Mail cheques, money orders, cash to: or CLICK PayPal logo to donate!
|
Gary Tooze
|
|
Thank You!