![]()
![]()
![]()

directed by Clyde Geronimi, Wilfred Jackson, Hamilton Luske
USA 1951
”Alice in Wonderland” was one of the Disney’s very first
ideas for a feature length motion picture. He had acquired the rights for
Lewis Carroll’s book in the early thirties and in 1933 he began preparing
a feature length film, where live action would be combined with animation,
which was to star Mary Pickford as Alice. But when Paramount the same year
announced and released their version of the book, Disney dropped the
project.
In 1936, David Hall made the Mickey Mouse short “Thru the mirror”, and
Disney began considering the project again, but postponed it, as the
studio at that time already had two films in production. While Disney in
1938 registered the film with the MPAA, it wasn’t until after the war, in
1945, Disney finally announced that the studio would make “Alice in
Wonderland”, now with Ginger Rodgers as Alice. But after seeing “Song of
the South” in 1946, Disney replaced Rodgers with his new child star Luana
Patten, who played Ginny in “Song of the South”, and also decided to make
it an all animation film. For various reasons, Disney later replaced
Patten with first Margaret O’Brien, and finally in 1948 to have only
10-year old Kathryn Beaumont play the lead.
“Alice in Wonderland” was at that time Disney’s most expensive production,
a budget of $3 million, and his most problematic production. Disney’s
major problem was how to translate the books somewhat unconnecting
stories, its poems and its charm to the screen. An incredible amount of
scenes were story boarded and over thirty songs were written. At one
point, the project was so huge, that a joke at the studio suggested the
final version would have a lenght of two weeks. Another problem, which
Disney in his late years spoke about, was, that Alice, according to him,
was a spoiled brat without a heart. Finally, Disney had originally decided
to have the animations been drawn in the style of the original
illustrations by John Tenniel, but after having seen tests, he decided to
drop this idea, partly because it slowed the animationproces down, partly
because he feared, that the style wouldn’t be identifiable with a Disney
film. As a result, the final film became a series of compromises and
simplifications of a few key passages.
The film premiered July 26, 1951 and was butchered by the critics. The
“New Yorker” was the harshest, calling it a dreadful mockery of a classic,
violence against the style of Tenniel, and that Disney attempted to hide
his failure to understand a literary masterpiece with a few shiny tunes
more suitable for a flea circus. Even “Life Magazine”, normally Disney
strongest supporter, gave it the thumbs down. But also the audience turned
their backs to the film, and for the first time ever, Disney chose to
shelf a film. It wasn’t seen again until 1954, this time in an edited
version on TV, and where other Disney films were re-released every sixth
or seventh year, “Alice in Wonderland” was not. It remained shelved.
However in 1968 Disney released the film in a 16mm version rental version.
It was subsequently re-discovered by the psychedelic generation and became
a huge success because of its surrealism and its connections to the drug
culture. As a result, Disney withdrew the rental version, as the studio
didn't appreciated the association. It was finally re-released in 1974,
with a psychedelic poster even.
As a film, “Alice in Wonderland” is a Disney classic, but in no way
amongst his major films, mainly because Disney attempted to squeeze a
classic into a Disney template, where grotesque characters became
stereotyped cute Disney figures, where complex passages became simplified
by a cute little song, and because the production had so many problems,
that the final result became incoherent and very episodic.
While children love it, adults and Disney fans should approach the film as
a fantastic fiasco, as Disney’s most ambitious project and has his most
flawed film.
Posters
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Theatrical Release: July 26, 1951
Reviews More Reviews DVD Reviews
DVD Comparison:
Walt Disney Studios (Gold Classic Collection) - Region 1 - NTSC vs. Walt Disney Studios (2-Disc Masterpiece Edition) - Region 1 - NTSC vs. Walt Disney Studios (Specialudgave) - Region 2 - PAL
Big thanks to Bill McAlpine and Henrik Sylow for the Screen Caps!
(Walt Disney Studios (Gold Classic Collection) - Region 1 - NTSC - LEFT vs. Walt Disney Studios (2-Disc Masterpiece Edition) - Region 1 - NTSC - MIDDLE vs. Walt Disney Studios (Specialudgave) - Region 2 - PAL - RIGHT)
| Comments | On
Region 1 Disney's 2-disc Masterpiece Edition DVD is a great improvement over their Gold Classic edition. The Gold Classic edition is far too dark and murky with much of the detailed backplate artwork completely obscured in darkness. Digital work has been performed on the Masterpiece Edition to remove dirt and scratches and to improve and smooth the colours with a slight loss of visible grain. The Masterpiece Edition shows more information on the top and right side and a sliver less on the left. Most of the Gold Classic extras are included on the new edition in addition to an entire 2nd disc of extras. Easy choice - buy the Masterpiece edition! Bill McAlpine
Henrik Sylow |
DVD
Menus
(Walt Disney Studios (Gold Classic
Collection) - Region 1 - NTSC - LEFT vs. Walt Disney Studios
(2-Disc Masterpiece Edition) - Region 1 - NTSC - MIDDLE vs. Walt
Disney Studios (Specialudgave) - Region 2 - PAL - RIGHT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Screen Captures
(Walt
Disney Studios (Gold Classic Collection) - Region 1 - NTSC - TOP
vs. Walt Disney Studios (2-Disc Masterpiece Edition) - Region 1 - NTSC -
MIDDLE vs. Walt Disney Studios (Specialudgave) - Region 2 - PAL -
BOTTOM)
NTSC captures in native
720px
PAL captures resized to 720px from 768px
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Walt Disney Studios (Gold Classic Collection) - Region 1 - NTSC - TOP vs. Walt Disney Studios (2-Disc Masterpiece Edition) - Region 1 - NTSC - MIDDLE vs. Walt Disney Studios (Specialudgave) - Region 2 - PAL - BOTTOM)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Walt Disney Studios (Gold Classic Collection) - Region 1 - NTSC - TOP vs. Walt Disney Studios (2-Disc Masterpiece Edition) - Region 1 - NTSC - MIDDLE vs. Walt Disney Studios (Specialudgave) - Region 2 - PAL - BOTTOM)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Walt Disney Studios (Gold Classic Collection) - Region 1 - NTSC - TOP vs. Walt Disney Studios (2-Disc Masterpiece Edition) - Region 1 - NTSC - MIDDLE vs. Walt Disney Studios (Specialudgave) - Region 2 - PAL - BOTTOM)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Walt Disney Studios (Gold Classic Collection) - Region 1 - NTSC - TOP vs. Walt Disney Studios (2-Disc Masterpiece Edition) - Region 1 - NTSC - MIDDLE vs. Walt Disney Studios (Specialudgave) - Region 2 - PAL - BOTTOM)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Walt Disney Studios (Gold Classic Collection) - Region 1 - NTSC - TOP vs. Walt Disney Studios (2-Disc Masterpiece Edition) - Region 1 - NTSC - MIDDLE vs. Walt Disney Studios (Specialudgave) - Region 2 - PAL - BOTTOM)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Walt Disney Studios (Gold Classic Collection) - Region 1 - NTSC - TOP vs. Walt Disney Studios (2-Disc Masterpiece Edition) - Region 1 - NTSC - MIDDLE vs. Walt Disney Studios (Specialudgave) - Region 2 - PAL - BOTTOM)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report Card:
![]()
![]()
![]()
DONATIONS Keep DVDBeaver alive and advertisement free:
Mail cheques, money orders, cash to: or CLICK PayPal logo to donate!
|
Gary Tooze 1775 Rowntree Court Mississauga, Ontario, L4W 4V3 CANADA |
|
Thank You!