The first John Ford film I can remember seeing, probably encountered
around the time I was in first grade, was archetypal:
She Wore a Yellow Ribbon
(1949). Apart from its uncommonly vibrant colors, this had just
about everything a Ford movie was supposed to have: cavalry changes,
drunken brawls, Monument Valley, and such standbys as John Wayne,
Ben Johnson, Harry Carey Jr., Victor McLaglen, and Ford’s older
brother Francis; only Maureen O’Hara and Ward Bond were missing.
Ford was one of the very first auteurs I was aware of, along with
Cecil B. De Mille, Walt Disney, and Alfred Hitchcock, and what made
him especially distinctive was that he was apparently less
restricted than the others to a single genre. De Mille made
spectaculars, Disney did cartoons, and Hitchcock specialized in
thrillers, but a Ford movie could be a western, a war movie, or
something else.
The ten relatively
neglected Ford movies I’ve singled out here include a few that still
can’t be found on DVD. I might well have selected some others if I’d
seen them more recently (I’m currently looking forward to re-seeing
the 1945
They Were Expendable, for
instance), but I’d none the less argue that all of these are well
worth hunting down. Though a few of them are arguably as
quintessentially Fordian as
She Wore a Yellow Ribbon
(and three are honest-to-Pete westerns), most of the others are
sufficiently atypical to suggest that Ford is a richer, more
complex, and more versatile filmmaker than we usually assume. I’ve
also drawn attention in the following remarks to some of the abler
Ford commentaries and sources that have helped me find my way
through the intricacies of his work.
(NOTE: CLICK ON
TITLES, COVERS OR UNDERLINED TEXT FOR LINKS)
|
Bucking Broadway
(1917). Out of the approximately 70 silent films that
Ford directed, less than 15 are currently known to have
survived.
Bucking Broadway--one of the 11 or 12 westerns
he turned out in 1917, the year he started
directing--was rediscovered only eight years ago in a
Paris film archive, where it was hiding under a
different title. (It exists on DVD, but only as a
supplement to the “08,” “automne
2004” issue of the excellent, biannual
French film journal Cinéma--which has been including
DVDs of rare archival finds in every one of its issues
since 2003. - available
HERE).
Not
nearly as well known or as ambitious than Ford’s
Straight Shooting, which was shot earlier the same
year (and was found in a Czech film archive in 1969),
Bucking Broadway is
none the less delightful for its visual qualities, such
as the gorgeous landscape shots at the beginning and the
eye-filling action climax in which a team of Wyoming
ranchers are seen galloping down Manhattan’s Broadway
(actually downtown Los Angeles). |
|
Like
Straight Shooting, it stars Harry Carey--a
veteran of D.W. Griffith films who was almost twice
Ford’s age and served as his mentor when he was
getting started, as well as the star of over two
dozen of Ford’s early pictures. Mainly a light
comedy, it hinges on a romantic rivalry between
Cheyenne Harry (a cowboy character Carey played in
most of his Ford films) and a villainous city
slicker and cattle buyer played by Vester Pegg
(another Ford regular at the time) over a rancher’s
daughter (still another Ford regular, Molly
Malone). |
|
Pilgrimage (1933).
For many years, Ford specialists such as
Tag Gallagher and
Joseph McBride have been singling out this
uncharacteristic melodrama as one of the master’s unsung
masterpieces, even though it was a big commercial
success in 1933, and now that Fox has finally issued a
digital restoration, their claims seem wholly justified.
In fact, one of the best reasons for seeing the
restoration a second time is to follow McBride’s
excellent commentary, invaluable both for its factual
information and its critical insights. (McBride’s
observation that Ford likes to follow tragedy with farce
in the same pictures is especially helpful.) What’s most
unsettling is the poisonous spin it gives to what is
more often one of Ford’s sappiest themes, mother love.
The mother in this case, remarkably played by stage
actress Henrietta Crosman, is a selfish Arkansas widow
and farmer in 1918 who’s so traumatized by the prospect
of losing her son to the woman he loves and sleeps with
(this is pre-Code) that she spitefully signs him into
the army, where he’s instantly killed in World War 1.
She even states fairly explicitly in the dialogue that
she’d rather see him dead than lose him to another
woman, and after he dies, she refuses to recognize
either his illegitimate son or his mother.
After this
excruciating first act, the film unexpectedly turns into
a light comedy with occasional dark undertones once the
mother reluctantly agrees to join a group of “gold star”
mothers on a pilgrimage to their sons’ graves in France.
The film then starts to function on a good many
registers at once: as a devastating critique of war
propaganda, as a satire about yahoo Americans or
“innocents abroad” (a theme popularized by Mark Twain in
his first best seller), as a complex character study
that steadily grows in impact, and as a kind of parable
about moral redemption in which the mother finally comes
to terms with her own responsibility for her son’s
death. |
|
|
|
Judge Priest
(1934). “In
some ways,” Dave Kehr has written, “Judge
Priest marks the birth of the poet in
Ford.” There’s certainly no other Ford movie that I know
that comes closer to celebrating the idyllic 19th
century America of Mark Twain, expressing nostalgia for
the snug, leisurely life in closely interknit small-town
communities. But for me the real triumphs of this
laid-back masterpiece are the performances—especially
those of Will Rogers, Stepin Fetchit, and, in the film’s
courtroom climax, Henry B. Walthall (the “”Little
Colonel” of
The Birth of a Nation,
almost 20 years later.) Rogers, who was something of a
national sage when he made this movie, tends to be
underrated or at least taken for granted these days, but
listen to the amazing job he does in one scene of
imitating Stepin Fetchit, and notice how he pulls off
the impossible task in another of talking to his dead
wife without resorting to the sort of sentimentality
you’d expect. (This scene clearly anticipates the more
famous one in which Henry Fonda in the title role of
Ford’s 1939
Young Mr. Lincoln
speaks to Ann Rutledge at her graveside.) |
|
The Long Voyage Home
(1940). What is it about this moody, lyrical adaptation
of four short Eugene O’Neill “sea plays” by Ford regular
Dudley Nichols that makes Tag Gallagher and Joseph
McBride hurry past it as quickly as possible? Gallagher
gives it roughly the same amount of space as Sex
Hygiene---a half-hour army training film about venereal
diseases that Ford directed the following year--while
McBride calls it “extravagantly overwrought,” an epithet
I’d rather apply to Ford’s previous
The Informer and
his later
The Fugitive. Maybe
because the film was overrated in its own era there’s an
impulse to underrate it now, but I’m not buying into
this short-sighted rationale for a downgrade.
This
rambling, melancholy tale about the lonely lives of
merchant seamen is certainly expressionistic, and the
raw emotions it expresses are unusually direct for Ford.
O’Neill himself loved the film, and not because it’s at
all faithful to the letter of his work (the action has
been updated from the teens to the present), though it’s
as doom-ridden and as riddled with despair as one would
expect any good O’Neill adaptation to be. |
|
(The
title anticipates that of his posthumously released,
autobiographical masterwork,
Long Day’s Journey into Night.)
It has the most beautiful deep-focus cinematography by
Gregg Toland prior to
Citizen Kane; Welles’ own grand
gesture of sharing a title card in the credits with Toland came from Ford’s identical gesture in this film,
a year earlier. It also has John Wayne’s most
interesting performance when he’s playing someone other
than himself—as Ole Olsen, a young Swedish sailor who
misses his mother, with an accent that sounds authentic.
The remainder of the superb ensemble cast includes
Thomas Mitchell, Ian Hunter, Barry Fitzgerald, John
Qualen, Ward Bond, Wilfred Lawson, Joe Sawyer, and, in
her first work for Ford, Mildred Natwick.
|
|
|
|
Wagon Master
(1950). Collectivity is one of Ford’s grandest and
most persistent themes, and it comes to the fore in this
small-scale western with no stars than remained one of
Ford’s personal favorites. The minimal plot focuses on
the various interactions between half a dozen separate
groups: ornery outlaws (who kill a bartender out of
spite in the pre-credits sequence), horse traders (Ford
regulars Harry Carey Jr. and Ben Johnson), traveling
Mormons (including a couple of more Ford standbys, Ward
Bond and Jane Darwell) who hire the horse traders to
help them out, show people (including Joanne Dru and
Alan Mowbray), lawmen, and Indians. Furthermore, this
may be the closest Ford ever got to making a musical,
another form that’s usually collective in spirit; the
Sons of the Pioneers--a vocal group that Ford would use
again on his next feature, the last and least of his
cavalry-trilogy films,
Rio Grande--sings
no less than four songs, and when cowpokes Carey and
Johnson decide to join the Mormons, their decision is
expressed by singing the movie’s theme song. |
|
|
The Sun Shines Bright
(1953). It seems significant that Ford’s favorites among
his own films tended to be the artier efforts that did
relatively poorly at the box office:
The Informer
(1935);
The Long Voyage Home
(1940);
The Fugitive
(1946—perhaps the most self-consciously composed of all
his pictures);
Wagon Master; and
the only non-independent feature in the bunch, a belated
spin-off of
Judge Priest
that he made for Republic Pictures, one of the cheaper
studios in Hollywood. This time he approaches the Irvin
S. Cobb universe without any stars--unless one counts
Stepin Fetchit, the only significant actor apart from
Francis Ford (in his last credited screen appearance)
who appears in both pictures, and a subversive purveyor
of southern black stereotypes whose subtly loaded
portrayals of servility masking cunning have often been
misunderstood. |
A lot of
Ford’s most deeply moving work could be described as a
meditation on social rituals, and this masterpiece
really comes into its own, despite a rather convoluted
plot, in its closing stretches, when it becomes nothing
but social rituals—a funeral, an election, and a parade.
The funeral and the parade (the latter in tribute to the
Judge Priest,
played here by Charles Winninger, who has recently
officiated at the funeral of a fallen woman), and
there’s an almost Faulknerian twist and irony in the way
that the funeral becomes triumphant while the
celebratory parade becomes almost unbearably sad and
tragic. This is one of the Ford films in which farce
precedes rather than follows tragedy, but the
bittersweet aftertaste is no less pungent. |
|
Mogambo (1953).
Probably the least characteristic Ford movie in my
selection isn’t very satisfying as an African action
picture. Ford, who was ill during part of the shooting,
left most of the animal footage to his second unit, and
the crosscutting between the Hollywood stars (Clark
Gable reprising his own role in this remake of the 30s
hit
Red Dust, Ava
Gardner, and Grace Kelly) and the apes or panthers looks
pretty artificial. If
Hatari! (1962),
where the actors and animals share the same shots, can
be viewed in many respects as Howard Hawks’ “answer” to
Mogambo (much as
Leo McCarey’s underrated Good Sam was his own “answer to
Frank Capra’s
It’s a Wonderful Life),
it’s worth adding that Gardner’s showgirl character here
is quintessentially Hawksian—both as the outsider we
identify with and the outspoken prattler who articulates
everything the other main characters are too repressed
to blurt out (as well as a maternal figure like Elsa
Martinelli in
Hatari! who coddles
baby elephants). In fact, what mostly makes this movie
click is erotic star power triple-distilled. Even more
than Hitchcock, Ford, who fought to cast Kelly in this
picture, knew how to make her sexy by treating her as a
sexually voracious volcano who’s constantly about to
erupt and no less constantly in denial about her desire.
Here she’s married to an anthropologist on a jungle
safari and lusting after animal trapper Gable, while
Gardner alternates as romantic rival and as good-natured
referee. |
|
The Long Gray Line
(1955). In the recently updated edition of his 1986 book on
Ford (which is available only online
HERE), Tag Gallagher
reports that “The question once came up with Jean-Marie
Straub, what is an experimental film? Straub slammed his
fist on the table: `The
Long Gray Line! That’s an experimental
film.’” Well, not exactly—it’s a fictionalized biopic about
an Irish-born, not-very-smart-or-especially-capable phys-ed
instructor at West Point named Marty Maher (Tyrone Power,
playing opposite Maureen O’Hara). It’s also Ford’s first
picture in CinemaScope. On one level it’s a patriotic,
pro-military sob-fest with corny slapstick that
affectionately depicts then-President Dwight D. Eisenhower
when he was still a West Point cadet (played, naturally, by
Harry Carey Jr.), brimming with the kind of epic schmaltz
that Ford has often been faulted for. But it also has the
eerie ambivalence of Ford’s richest and most conflicted
work, focusing on failure, death, dissolution, and defeat as
it’s perceived through an utter mediocrity’s fading memory. |
|
|
Sergeant Rutledge
(1960). Apart from serving as one of the key
inspirations and reference points for Pedro Costa’s
digital Portuguese masterpiece Colossal Youth
(2006), this unusually expressionistic western by
Ford---centered on the trial of a black cavalry officer
(Woody Strode) accused of rape and murder, and
structured around a good many flashbacks—is especially
notable for its very theatrical lighting schemes.
But it’s also potent, above all, because of the rare
emotion that Strode brings to the title part. The
political incorrectness that seems inextricably tied to
some of Ford’s finest insights and moments comes to the
fore in Strode’s climactic scene at the trial. Even if
some other aspects of this film are labored and
formulaic, this is a far more plausible attempt by Ford
to deal with ethnic persecution and racism than his
lamentable
Cheyenne Autumn
(1964)—which purports to make amends for Ford’s earlier
treatment of Native Americans and then ultimately avoids
dealing with them at all by treating them like ersatz
Holocaust Jews. |
|
7 Women (1965).
Patricia Neal was originally cast in the heroic lead
role of Ford’s apocalyptic final feature, which
uncharacteristically focuses almost entirely on female
characters--as an atheistic, hard-drinking, foul-mouthed
doctor in a Chinese mission during the 1930s. But she
became ill on her third day of shooting, and was quickly
replaced by Anne Bancroft, who does a terrific job.
Several critics have compared this character to Ava
Gardner’s in
Mogambo, and the similarity is evident
despite the fact that Bancroft plays a dedicated doctor
while Gardner plays a flighty showgirl. An unusual film
for Ford, it’s also clearly a very personal one about
the collapse of civilization and the sacrifices needed
for the survival of society. It was a resounding
commercial flop because MGM and most audiences didn’t
know what to make of it. It’s certainly more of a
shocker than any other Ford film I’ve selected, and the
less you know about it in advance, the better.
|
In one of
the most provocative and original pieces about Ford
that I’ve read, by Japanese critic Shigehiko Hasumi
HERE, a
persuasive, detailed argument is made about the
significance of throwing things in Ford’s films,
which functions emotionally and thematically (often
expressing a character’s solitude) as well as
formally. As Hasumi points out, 7 Women ends
with a powerful gesture of this kind, and “No other
filmmaker has ended his career with such mastery.”
But you’ll have to see the movie in order to
perceive why and how. |
|