Note: Just for the record, I’ve already written at one time or
another for this site about
Hallelujah, I’m a Bum!,
Judge Priest,
Love Me Tonight,
M,
The Man Who Could Work Miracles,
Pilgrimage, and
Vampyr -- which is the
only reason why I’m not doing so now.
So
add these seven titles to all of those found below (listed
alphabetically) and you’ll have 28 recommendations in all. And even
this list is very far from exhaustive. For instance, I haven’t even
mentioned Sacha Guitry, the witty playwright-filmmaker-actor whose
cinematic “golden age,” 1936-1938, comprising no less than nine
features (my favorite is the trilingual The Pearls of the
Crown), are all available with English subtitles in one
gigantic box set issued in France by Gaumont,
Sacha Guitry L’Age d’or 1936-1938.
But don’t get me started…
(NOTE:
HYPERLINKS ARE ON
TITLES, COVERS or BOLD, MAROON, UNDERLINED TEXT)

|
L’Atalante.
Jean Vigo’s only full-length feature (1934, 89 min.),
one of the supreme masterpieces of French cinema, was
edited and then brutally re-edited while Vigo was on his
deathbed, so a definitive restoration is impossible. But
the one carried out in 1990 is probably the best and
most complete we’ll ever be able to see, and it’s a
wonder to behold. The simple love-story plot involves
the marriage of a provincial woman (Dita Parlo) to the
skipper of a barge (Jean Dasté), and the only other
characters of consequence are the barge’s skeletal crew
(Michel Simon and Louis Lefebvre) and a peddler (Gilles
Margaritis) who flirts with the wife at a cabaret and
describes the wonders of Paris to her. The sensuality of
the characters and the settings, indelibly caught in
Boris Kaufman’s glistening cinematography, are only part
of the film’s remarkable poetry, the conviction of which
goes beyond such categories as realism or surrealism,
just as the powerful sexuality in the film ultimately
transcends such categories as heterosexuality,
homosexuality, and even bisexuality. Shot by shot and
moment by moment, the film is so fully alive to the
world’s possibilities that magic and reality seem to
function as opposite sides of the same coin, with
neither fully adequate to Vigo’s vision. |
 |
Blonde Crazy.
The credited director of this 79-minute feature about
scrambling con artists is Roy Del Ruth, a solid company
man at Warners. But the true auteurs here are the
brilliantly proactive and expressive costars, James
Cagney and Joan Blondell -- as aided and abetted by the
screenwriting team of John Bright and Kubec Glasmon,
who worked on at least half a dozen other Cagney
vehicles during this period (not to mention just as many
Blondell features, including the underrated
Union Depot).
Packed with loads of plot twists and saucy repartee,
this unassuming comedy-drama probably offers more
Depression flavor than any other item in this survey
apart from the corrosive
Man’s Castle,
and it’s strictly an oversight that this hasn’t yet come
out on DVD. |
 |
 |
 |
Boudu Saved from Drowning.
The 30s was an especially strong period for Howard Hawks
(represented by two films here), for Ernest Lubitsch
(also represented by two films), for Leo McCarey
(ditto), and, most of all, for Jean Renoir (represented
by three), who turned out 13 features during that
decade, the second, third, and thirteenth of which are
cited here. Boudu (1932), the third, stars the
great Michel Simon (see
L’Atalante,
above) as a mangy and unapologetic tramp saved from
drowning by a middle-class Parisian bookseller who’s
determined to reform and “civilize” him. A ruthless and
often hilarious tweaking of liberal delusions that
scandalized Bosley Crowther, lead film reviewer of the
New York Times, so thoroughly when it opened in
the U.S. for the first time (in 1967!) that he walked
out before the end, it continues to charm and provoke.
(By contrast, Paul Mazursky’s toothless 1986 remake,
Down and Out in Beverly Hills,
offends only those who care about the original.)
Renoir’s light-hearted comedy is also a kind of
irreverent celebration of Boudu’s sloth, diffidence, and
instinctually animalistic behavior. Renoir’s
off-the-cuff manner of shooting remains as carefree and
as fresh as the lead character.
|
 |
City Lights.
My favorite Charlie Chaplin feature (1931) -- his first
sound picture, but not, properly speaking, his first
talkie--is also probably the one on which he exercised
the most patience and perfectionism, with almost two
years of shooting, countless retakes, and a recasting of
the female lead (with Georgia Hale, his female lead in
The Gold Rush, eventually replaced by
Virginia Cherrill, who was herself subsequently fired
and rehired, as the blind flower-selling street waif who
believes Chaplin’s Tramp is a millionaire). It’s also
quite likely the Chaplin feature that can boast the best
DVD extras, including one brilliant seven-minute gag
sequence that Chaplin deleted because it interfered with
the film’s overall architecture. Interestingly enough,
and significantly, the tragic final sequence, in
close-ups, rightly regarded as the most emotionally
wrenching sequence in Chaplin’s career, is edited in
such a way that it has glaring continuity errors, none
of which matter in the slightest because of the power of
his performance. |
 |
 |
|
Dishonored.
My favorite among the seven glittering Josef von
Sternberg features starring Marlene Dietrich, all of
them made between 1930 and 1935, is ironically the least
well known, and currently available only as a Swedish
import, although Jean-Luc Godard once included it in a
list of his ten favorite American films. It’s the second
American film Sternberg made with Dietrich, although it
was completed before he released the first (Morocco),
and in some ways it’s the most stylistically perfect of
all his sound features. In it, Dietrich plays X-27, a
character clearly inspired by Mara Hari — an Austrian
prostitute whose patriotism leads her to agree to spy on
the Russians (in particular, Victor McLaglen) and whose
activities ultimately lead to her death by firing squad.
|
 |
Duck Soup.
From my favorite Sternberg to my favorite Marx Brothers
is less of a leap than it might initially appear to be,
especially because both deal with national issues in
abstract and rather absurdist terms. Leo McCarey’s only
encounter with Chico, Groucho, Harpo, and Zeppo is
memorable for many other reasons: it has fewer
distractions (i.e., gratuitous musical and romantic
sequences) than any of the other Marx Brothers movies,
more purely visual delights with links to silent cinema
(above all, the sequence with multiple Grouchos), and as
a wholesale ridicule of everything that leads to and
justifies warfare, it has the most bite as satire as
well as the most free-wheeling spirit. |
 |

 |
The Great Consoler
and
Ivan.
I’m cheating a little here by including in a single slot my
two favorite early-sound Soviet pictures, both still
woefully unavailable on DVD. (Thankfully, some other
innovative gems from this period are available now,
such as Boris Barnet’s
Outskirts,
Vsevolod Pudovkin’s
Deserter,
and Dziga Vertov’s
Enthusiasm.)
Both are pretty wild and adventurous, but the first of these
(1933), by Lev Kuleshov, is a true mind-boggler. It leaps
freely between three blocks of material: (1) In prison for
embezzlement, William Sydney Porter, better known as O.
Henry, is persuaded by the warden to convince a fellow
prisoner, safecracker Jimmy Valentine, to open a locked bank
safe without explosives in order not to destroy the papers
inside, after the banker, who knows the combination, skips
town with the funds. Valentine can do this only by painfully
filing down his fingernails to sensitize his fingers, but
the warden promises to grant him a pardon in return.
Meanwhile, Porter is so impressed by Valentine’s skill that
he writes a famous short story, “A Retrieved Reformation,”
romanticizing Valentine’s heroic exploits. But then the
warden, reneging on his promise, refuses to release
Valentine, forcing Porter to realize in despair that he and
Valentine have both been exploited. (2) “A Retrieved
Reformation,” recounted in parody form, as a Russian-style
western. (3) The effect of this story on one reader, Dulcie
(Alexandra Khokhlova, Kuleshov’s wife), a shopgirl who is
being forced to prostitute herself by the same cop who
convinced the prison warden to exploit Valentine’s gifts.
Even though Porter’s escapist yarn falsifies the truth, it
also inspires Dulcie to shoot the cop when he tries to
exploit her in turn….Ivan
(1932), the first talkie by the great Ukrainian filmmaker
Alexander Dovzhenko and a rapturous audiovisual poem,
supposedly celebrates the building of a huge dam on the
Dnieper River but never even bothers to show us the
completed structure; there are three separate characters
named Ivan in the picture and a great deal of wonderful
comedy….Both these masterpieces were unjustly denounced in
Russia as “formalist” when they came out, but that’s
certainly no excuse for Westerners to ignore them today.
|
|

I Was Born, But…,
Tokyo Chorus,
and
Passing Fancy.
Another form of cheating is to list all three of these
late silent pictures of Yasujiro Ozu, usefully packaged
together with optional piano scores by Criterion as “Eclipse
Series 10: Silent Ozu — Three Family Comedies”.
And the only reason why I’m listing I Was Born, But…
(1932) first, before
Tokyo Chorus(1931),
is that it’s my favorite Ozu film, full stop, even
though the other two aren’t far behind. My only
complaint about the packaging of these three
masterpieces is that calling them simply “family
comedies” short-changes them, even though all three
certainly have their hilarious moments. (In fact, the
opening sequence of the 1933
Passing Fancy
may be the funniest piece of slapstick Ozu ever filmed.
At a public music and storytelling performance, a stray
purse is surreptitiously picked up, investigated, and
then discarded by a succession of people in the
audience, who toss it around like a beanbag -- a string
of repetitions that overlaps with a series of frenetic
dances performed by many of the same people when they’re
bitten by fleas.) To call them all “family
comedy-dramas” might come closer to the mark, but this
label is also inadequate:
Passing Fancy,
which was inspired in part by King Vidor’s
The Champ
(1931), basically focuses on a day laborer who’s a
single parent and his son, a duo rather than a family
per se. The two are both played by Ozu regulars, Takeshi
Sakamoto (who in fact plays in all three features) and
Tokkan Kozo (who also plays in I Was Born, But…)
And it’s also worth emphasizing that
Tokyo Chorus
and
Passing Fancy
are both quintessential Depression films. |
|

 |
Make Way for Tomorrow.
Due out from Criterion later this month, Leo McCarey’s
1937 heartbreaker, a particular favorite of Orson Welles,
didn’t win any Oscars, but when McCarey won an Oscar the
very same year for another movie,
The Awful Truth,
he tactfully suggested in his acceptance speech that the
Academy might have given it to the wrong picture.
There’s arguably no other film ever made anywhere that
deals more nakedly and candidly with the mistreatment of
old people (although Yasujiro Ozu’s best-known feature,
Tokyo Story,
was clearly influenced by it), and McCarey being McCarey,
this subject is milked for laughs as well as tears. It’s
also one of the most romantic movies ever made in
Hollywood, and the mounting tragedy of the final act is
devastating. The focus is on an elderly couple (Victor
Moore and Beulah Bondi) whose children don’t know what
to do with them, and rather than simply castigate them
for their cluelessness, McCarey understands their
dilemma as well as the situation of their parents; with
Fay Bainter, Thomas Mitchell, and Porter Hall. |

The Man I Killed
aka
Broken Lullaby.
Technically available from Spain, but not at all easy to
come by (and available only under its rerelease title),
Ernst Lubitsch’s atypical antiwar film (1932), the first
movie he ever cowrote with the great Samson Raphaelson,
follows a French soldier in World War ( the unjustly
forgotten Phillips Holmes) who is so stricken about the
German soldier he killed in the trenches that he travels
to the dead man’s village and meets his family. Only 76
minutes long, this has much the same elliptical style,
exquisitely detailed and articulated, that Lubitsch
brought to his better-known romantic comedies and
musicals, but the directness and sincerity of the story
apparently disconcerted audiences at the time. No
matter: the sentiments expressed are not in the least
bit dated today. With Lionel Barrymore and Nancy
Carroll. |
 |

 |
Man’s Castle
Considering the deluxe job done with the dozen-disc “Murnau,
Borzage and Fox,” it’s rather
stupefying to reflect that Frank Borzage’s most potent
sound picture remains unavailable everywhere. But this
was a movie made at Columbia, not Fox, and apparently
not even the star power of Spencer Tracy suffices to put
this item on the market. He plays a spiky scrambler in
Manhattan during the Depression opposite an equally
homeless Loretta Young. The two wind up living together
in a Hooverville shack (alluded to in the film’s ironic
title) where she becomes pregnant, and I suspect that at
least part of the problem may be the eroticism
(including some brief nudity) and the complete lack of
sentimentality that have always made this a beleaguered
picture. It was certainly a commercial flop. Over 30
censorship cuts were made even before the film was
released, and this didn’t prevent some critics from
complaining about the harshness of what remained. “This
is the saga of a roughneck you wouldn’t put up in your
stable,” the Variety reviewer complained. “The
horses might complain. Spencer Tracy is cast in his most
distasteful role.” And in fact, Tracy’s character seems
almost benign alongside his neighbor, played by Marjorie
Rambeau, who shoots a would-be rapist and a police
snitch with the line, "This ain’t murder, this is just
house cleaning.” |

La nuit du carrefour.
To the best of my knowledge, Jean Renoir’s low-budget
adaptation of a Inspector Maigret mystery by Georges
Simenon—a novel available in English as
Maigret at the Crossroads--remains
so obscure outside of France that it’s never even been
subtitled in English, and you can’t (yet) even find it
on DVD there. But this highly atmospheric noir, set
around a garage in the grubbiest of Parisian suburbs, is
without a doubt the most erotic movie Renoir ever made,
thanks mainly to the Danish actress Winna Winifried, who
plays a major role as a druggy femme fatale named Else
Andersen (and who appeared in only half a dozen French
and English films after this one, all of them even more
obscure). Renoir’s brother Pierre plays Maigret, nearly
all of the action occurs at night, and part of what’s so
exciting about the film, in spite of its confusing plot
(apparently occasioned by one of the reels being lost),
is the use of direct sound, especially in conjuring up
an intricate sense of offscreen space. This was Renoir’s
second talkie feature after La Chienne, and
significantly the opening credits highlight the various
noises in a garage as if they were stretches of
musique concrète. Godard has celebrated
La nuit du carrefour
as Renoir’s most mysterious film, as well as the
greatest of all French police thrillers. |
 |

 |
Only Angels Have Wings.
Honest and profound hokum may sound like a contradiction
in terms, but I can’t think of a better way to describe
Howard Hawks’ unlikely yet beautiful and thrilling
masterpiece (1939) about daredevil pilots in a remote
South American port who risk their lives delivering the
mail across a threatening mountain pass. The sense of
void and impending, meaningless death that surrounds and
encloses all the banter, braggadocio, and risk-taking
makes this seem like the most existential of Hawks’
adventures. Cary Grant--once described by Dave Kehr in
this film as “the high priest of some Sartrean
temple”--is the group’s fatherly boss, Thomas Mitchell
his best friend, Jean Arthur the showgirl who sticks
around because of her love-struck devotion, and Sig
Ruman plays Dutchy, the uncle type who runs the bar
connected to the small airport. The uncannily expressive
silent star Richard Barthelmess plays the returning
pilot who once caused the death of a copilot due to
cowardice, and Rita Hayworth plays his newlywed wife, an
old flame of Grant’s. The precise sense of ethics
governing all the interactions between this motley crew
is as striking as the artificiality of the settings.
|

The Rules of the Game.
Virtually everyone agrees that this is Jean Renoir’s
supreme masterpiece, made and released the same year as
Only Angels Have Wings
and even more of a virtuoso ensemble work. Yet
this was so adroit in catching the troubled zeitgeist
of France at the time that it was loathed by audiences
at the time of its release, making it the biggest flop
of Renoir’s career. Only many years later, after it was
painstakingly restored and reconstructed, was its
greatness seen and acknowledged. Mostly set in a country
chateau over a single weekend, where the crisscrossing
romantic intrigues of both guests and servants play out
in intricate counterpoint, culminating in a costume
party, Renoir joins the proceedings as a major actor and
character as well as writer-director, attempting to
serve as go-between between two of his most intimate
friends, the wife (Nora Grégor) of the Jewish marquis
(Marcel Dalio) who’s hosting the weekend and the
lovesick but rejected famous pilot (Roland Toutain) who
wants to run away with her. As a view of French society
in 1939, this tragicomic farce is both scathingly
satirical and warmly compassionate, though it was
plainly only the scathing satire that most members of
the contemporary audience responded to.
|
 |

 |
Scarface.
My all-time favorite gangster film, put together like a
macabre black comedy that eventually veers into
something very close to Greek tragedy (complete with
brother-sister incest), Howard Hawks’ uncharacteristic
masterpiece beats out the
Godfather
features in at least one major respect: it is completely
unsentimental about both crime and violence. (Among the
half-dozen credited and uncredited hands who worked on
the brittle script are Ben Hecht, W.R. Burnett, and
Hawks himself.) The movie is in fact so blunt (Howard
Hughes, the producer, always had a taste for
scandalizing his audience) that it had endless battles
with censors, a few of which it lost, yet its anarchic
spirit shines through triumphantly in spite of
everything. (The only concession—a stupid dialogue scene
among Concerned Citizens—clearly belongs to a different
picture.) Paul Muni’s galvanic screen debut in the title
role, Tony Camonte, a lout with a distinct resemblance
to Al Capone, plays him like an innocent caveman, at
once charming and terrifying. And the secondary cast—Ann
Dvorak, Karen Morley, Boris Karloff, George Raft
(another memorable debut, featuring his signature
coin-flipping), Vince Burnett (as an illiterate
secretary who makes Tony Camonte seem like an
intellectual), Osgood Perkins (father of
Anthony)—bristles with uncommon, manic energy. Note:
every time some gets bumped off in this movie, which is
pretty often, an X appears somewhere on the screen, and
the placements of these markers are both ingenious and
unnerving. |

Story of the Late Chrysanthemums.
My favorite feature by the great Kenji Mizoguchi is
lamentably available at present only in French and
Spanish editions, as
Contes des chrysanthèmes tardifs
and
Historia del último crisantemo,
respectively -- a situation that’s bound to change
eventually, because I’m far from alone in my reverence
for this film, even in the English-speaking world.
Oddly enough, the tragic plot, set in the late 19th
century, is very close to that of a backstage musical
such as
There’s No Business Like Show
Business, at least in its initial
setup. The hero, the adopted, spoiled, arrogant,
sixth-generation heir of a famous and very successful
Kabuki actor in Tokyo, is still immature as a performer,
but the only one with the guts to tell him so to his
face is a family maid and wet nurse whom he immediately
falls in love with because of her honesty and sincerity.
(Miraculously, all this occurs during one virtuoso
lengthy take that accompanies the two of them walking
home from the theater, a shot in perpetual motion.) The
maid then gets fired by the hero’s wife, and when he
disobeys his father’s order to stop seeing her, he gets
banished as well. They leave for Osaka, where he
struggles for years as an actor with her support and
eventually joins a traveling company. When he’s
eventually invited to rejoin his father, he’s forced to
part company with his lover, whom he sees again only on
her deathbed, after he’s become famous and celebrated.
Part of what’s so remarkable about this film’s two-part
structure is the way Mizoguchi repeats the same camera
angles in scenes that occur years apart, in the same
settings, to stir our memories almost subliminally. |
|

 |
Sylvia Scarlett.
For me, this bizarre and poetic 1935 feature that tanked
at the box office, is also in many ways the most
interesting and audacious movie George Cukor ever made.
Katharine Hepburn disguises herself as a boy to escape
from France to England with her crooked father (Edmund
Gwenn); they fall in with a group of traveling players,
including Cary Grant (at his most Cockney); the
ambiguous sexual feelings that Hepburn as a boy stirs in
both Grant and Brian Aherne (an aristocratic artist) are
part of what makes this film so subversive. Sudden
shifts in genre match the equally sudden shifts in
gender as the film disconcertingly changes tone every
few minutes, from farce to tragedy to romance to crime
thriller–-rather like some of the French New Wave films
(e.g.,
Breathless and
Shoot the Piano Player) that were
to come a quarter century later. Cukor’s usual
fascination with theater and the self-images of women,
assisted by his expert cast, somehow holds everything
together. The great English short story writer John
Collier collaborated on the script, and Joseph August
did the evocative cinematography. |

Trouble in Paradise.
By general agreement, this is Lubitsch’s most perfect
comedy, beautifully paced and acted and edited and
spoken, and it’s so graceful and seemingly effortless
that you can mainly only feel the Depression leaking
through the pauses and around the edges of the plot.
It’s also quite possibly Lubitsch’s most complex
picture, because, as in Renoir’s movies, every character
has his or her own reasons, and everyone invariably
knows and thinks more than he or she is saying. Herbert
Marshall and Miriam Hopkins are a couple of gifted
thieves and con artists who meet and fall in love in
Venice while attempting to fleece one another. After
they join forces, they go to work on an heiress who runs
a cosmetics factory in Paris (Kay Francis), with
Marshall serving as her secretary, but their prey seems
to know at times that she’s being robbed and doesn’t
exactly mind, and he’s more than a little ambivalent
about his work as well. The film also makes room for
Charles Ruggles and Edward Everett Horton as a couple of
romantic rivals and well-to-do stooges who are pursuing
the heiress as well; the screenplay is by Samson
Raphaelson and Grover Jones. |
 |
 |